NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

For running models locally, priced in Germany. At 32k context the first runs 61 models fully in memory, the second 61.

In short

Both have 32 GB of memory for models; the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 has 1,792 GB/s of bandwidth and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 896 GB/s. At 32k context both run the same 61 models we track fully in memory. On the models both run fully in memory, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is about 2.0× as fast as the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (estimated, median across models).

Updated . Speeds are estimates; how they are worked out.

Specifications

SpecNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
GPUGeForce RTX 5090RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Memory32 GB GDDR732 GB GDDR7
Memory bus512-bit256-bit
Memory bandwidth1,792 GB/s896 GB/s
FP16 compute209 TFLOPS54.94 TFLOPS
SoftwareCUDACUDA
Board power575 W200 W
PCIe generationGen 5Gen 5
PCIe lanesx16x16

What each runs

Estimated decode speed with the most precise quant that fits each one est.

ModelNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Qwen 3.8 27B35tok/sQ8_018tok/sQ8_0
Qwen 3.6 27B36tok/sQ8_018tok/sQ8_0
Gemma 4 31B39tok/sQ6_K19tok/sQ6_K
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B201tok/sQ6_K101tok/sQ6_K
Qwen 3.5 27B36tok/sQ8_018tok/sQ8_0
Gemma 4 26B-A4B132tok/sQ8_066tok/sQ8_0
Qwen 3.5 35B-A3B212tok/sQ6_K106tok/sQ6_K
GLM 4.7 Flash114tok/sQ6_K57tok/sQ6_K
Devstral Small 2 24B37tok/sQ8_018tok/sQ8_0
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B214tok/sUD-Q5_K_M107tok/sUD-Q5_K_M
Kimi Linear 48B-A3B311tok/sQ4_K_M156tok/sQ4_K_M
gpt-oss 20B206tok/sMXFP4103tok/sMXFP4
Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3B117tok/sQ6_K59tok/sQ6_K
Qwen3 32B35tok/sQ5_K_M18tok/sQ5_K_M
Gemma 4 12B82tok/sQ8_041tok/sQ8_0
Qwen 3.5 9B104tok/sQ8_052tok/sQ8_0
Mistral Small 3.2 24B37tok/sQ8_018tok/sQ8_0
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B35tok/sQ5_K_M17tok/sQ5_K_M
Gemma 3 27B35tok/sQ8_018tok/sQ8_0
Ministral 3 14B56tok/sQ8_028tok/sQ8_0
Qwen3 14B53tok/sQ8_026tok/sQ8_0
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B82tok/sQ8_041tok/sQ8_0
Qwen3 8B82tok/sQ8_041tok/sQ8_0
Phi-4 14B50tok/sQ8_025tok/sQ8_0
Qwen 3.5 4B198tok/sQ8_099tok/sQ8_0
Ministral 3 8B82tok/sQ8_041tok/sQ8_0
Granite 4.2 8B76tok/sQ8_038tok/sQ8_0
Gemma 4 E4B121tok/sQ8_061tok/sQ8_0
LFM2.5 8B-A1B249tok/sQ8_0125tok/sQ8_0
Llama 3.1 8B102tok/sQ6_K51tok/sQ6_K
Qwen2.5 0.5B1190tok/sQ8_0595tok/sQ8_0
Qwen3.5 0.8B901tok/sQ8_0450tok/sQ8_0
Qwen3.5 2B598tok/sQ5_K_M299tok/sQ5_K_M
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B392tok/sQ8_0196tok/sQ8_0
MiniCPM5 2B272tok/sQ8_0136tok/sQ8_0
Spark X2.5 4B258tok/smlx-4bit129tok/smlx-4bit
LFM2.5 2.6B227tok/sQ8_0114tok/sQ8_0
LFM2.5 VL 3B227tok/sQ8_0114tok/sQ8_0
Mellum2.1 12B A2.5B Thinking210tok/sQ8_0105tok/sQ8_0
FrogNano 4B 2609193tok/sQ8_097tok/sQ8_0
granite vision 4.1 4b176tok/sQ8_088tok/sQ8_0
granite 4.2 3b169tok/sQ8_085tok/sQ8_0
Kimi VL A3B Thinking 2506162tok/sQ8_081tok/sQ8_0
Kimi VL A3B156tok/smlx-8bit78tok/smlx-8bit
Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512156tok/sQ8_078tok/sQ8_0
LFM2.5 24B A2B139tok/sQ8_069tok/sQ8_0
GLM 4 9B 0414116tok/smlx-5bit58tok/smlx-5bit
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B111tok/sQ8_056tok/sQ8_0
GLM 4.6V Flash98tok/sQ8_049tok/sQ8_0
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B87tok/sQ8_043tok/sQ8_0
GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking85tok/smlx-8bit42tok/smlx-8bit
Ministral 3 8B Reasoning 251282tok/sQ8_041tok/sQ8_0
Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 251256tok/sQ8_028tok/sQ8_0
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B50tok/sQ8_025tok/sQ8_0
Qwen3.8 27B OBLITERATED48tok/smlx-4bit24tok/smlx-4bit
Muse Glimmer 30B46tok/sQ6_K23tok/sQ6_K
granite 4.2 30b38tok/sQ5_K_M19tok/sQ5_K_M
Devstral Small 250737tok/sQ8_018tok/sQ8_0
Magistral Small 250637tok/sQ8_018tok/sQ8_0
Magistral Small 250737tok/sQ8_018tok/sQ8_0
Magistral Small 250937tok/sQ8_018tok/sQ8_0
Qwen 3.5 122B-A10Boffloadoffload
Qwen3 Coder Nextoffloadoffload
Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12Boffloadoffload
Mistral Small 4 119Boffloadoffload
GLM 4.5 Airoffloadoffload
Qwen3 Next 80B-A3Boffloadoffload
Llama 3.3 70Boffloadoffload
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70Boffloadoffload
DeepSeek V4 Flashwon't runwon't run
GLM 5.3 Flashwon't runwon't run
Qwen 3.8 Flash Nextwon't runwon't run
MiniMax M2.7won't runwon't run
gpt-oss 120Bwon't runwon't run
DeepSeek R1won't runwon't run
DeepSeek R1 0528won't runwon't run
DeepSeek R1 Zerowon't runwon't run
DeepSeek V3won't runwon't run
DeepSeek V3 0324won't runwon't run
DeepSeek V3.1won't runwon't run
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminuswon't runwon't run
DeepSeek V3.2won't runwon't run
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731won't runwon't run
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Expwon't runwon't run
Devstral 2 123B Instruct 2512won't runwon't run
GLM 4.5won't runwon't run
GLM 4.5Vwon't runwon't run
GLM 4.6won't runwon't run
GLM 4.6Vwon't runwon't run
GLM 4.7won't runwon't run
GLM 5won't runwon't run
GLM 5.1won't runwon't run
GLM 5.2won't runwon't run
GLM 5.3won't runwon't run
Kimi Dev 72Bwon't runwon't run
Kimi K2won't runwon't run
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905won't runwon't run
Kimi K2 Thinkingwon't runwon't run
Kimi K2.5won't runwon't run
MiniMax M2won't runwon't run
MiniMax M2.1won't runwon't run
MiniMax M2.5won't runwon't run
MiniMax M3won't runwon't run
Mistral Medium 3.5 128Bwon't runwon't run

Questions

Which is better for local AI, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 or the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell?
Choose the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 for speed.
Which can run bigger models, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 or the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell?
At 32k context both run the same 61 models we track fully in memory.
Which is faster for local AI, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 or the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell?
On the models both run fully in memory, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is about 2.0× as fast as the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (estimated, median across models).

More comparisons

More hardware for local AI