Mac mini M4 16GB vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

For running models locally, priced in Germany. At 32k context the first runs 9 models fully in memory, the second 13.

In short

Both have 16 GB of memory for models; the Mac mini M4 16GB has 120 GB/s of bandwidth and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB 320 GB/s. At 32k context the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB runs 13 of the models we track fully in memory and the Mac mini M4 16GB 9; only the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB holds gpt-oss 20B. On the models both run fully in memory, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is about 1.8× as fast as the Mac mini M4 16GB (estimated, median across models). In Germany the Mac mini M4 16GB costs 800 € at eBay and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB 550 € at Amazon: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is 250 € cheaper.

Updated . Speeds are estimates; how they are worked out.

Specifications

SpecMac mini M4 16GBAMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
ChipApple M4 (10-core GPU)–
Memory bus128-bit128-bit
Memory bandwidth120 GB/s320 GB/s
FP16 compute3.76 TFLOPS103 TFLOPS
SoftwareMetalROCm
Unified memory16 GB–
GPU can use by default10.7 GB–
GPU can use, tuned10.666666666666666 GB–
Operating systemmacos–
ProcessorM4 10-core–
Storage256 GB–
GPU–Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Memory–16 GB GDDR6
Board power–160 W
PCIe generation–Gen 5
PCIe lanes–x16

What each runs

Estimated decode speed with the most precise quant that fits each one est.

ModelMac mini M4 16GBAMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
gpt-oss 20Bwon't run33tok/sMXFP4
Gemma 4 12B8tok/sQ5_K_M13tok/sQ8_0
Qwen 3.5 9B9tok/sQ6_K17tok/sQ8_0
Ministral 3 14Bwon't run12tok/sQ5_K_M
Qwen3 14Bwon't run12tok/sQ4_K_M
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B8tok/sQ4_K_M13tok/sQ8_0
Qwen3 8B8tok/sQ4_K_M13tok/sQ8_0
Qwen 3.5 4B14tok/sQ8_031tok/sQ8_0
Ministral 3 8B7tok/sQ5_K_M13tok/sQ8_0
Granite 4.2 8Bwon't run12tok/sQ8_0
Gemma 4 E4B9tok/sQ8_019tok/sQ8_0
LFM2.5 8B-A1B18tok/sQ8_040tok/sQ8_0
Llama 3.1 8B8tok/sQ5_K_M16tok/sQ6_K
Qwen 3.8 27Bwon't runoffload
Qwen 3.5 122B-A10Bwon't runoffload
Qwen 3.6 27Bwon't runoffload
Gemma 4 31Bwon't runoffload
Mistral Small 4 119Bwon't runoffload
Qwen 3.5 27Bwon't runoffload
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3Bwon't runoffload
Gemma 4 26B-A4Bwon't runoffload
Devstral Small 2 24Bwon't runoffload
GLM 4.7 Flashwon't runoffload
Qwen 3.5 35B-A3Bwon't runoffload
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3Bwon't runoffload
Kimi Linear 48B-A3Bwon't runoffload
Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3Bwon't runoffload
Qwen3 32Bwon't runoffload
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32Bwon't runoffload
Gemma 3 27Bwon't runoffload
Mistral Small 3.2 24Bwon't runoffload
Phi-4 14Bwon't runoffload
DeepSeek V4 Flashwon't runwon't run
GLM 5.3 Flashwon't runwon't run
Qwen 3.8 Flash Nextwon't runwon't run
MiniMax M2.7won't runwon't run
Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12Bwon't runwon't run
Qwen3 Coder Nextwon't runwon't run
gpt-oss 120Bwon't runwon't run
GLM 4.5 Airwon't runwon't run
Qwen3 Next 80B-A3Bwon't runwon't run
Llama 3.3 70Bwon't runwon't run

Questions

Which is better for local AI, the Mac mini M4 16GB or the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB?
Choose the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB to run bigger models. Choose the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB for speed. Choose the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB to spend less.
Which can run bigger models, the Mac mini M4 16GB or the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB?
At 32k context the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB runs 13 of the models we track fully in memory and the Mac mini M4 16GB 9; only the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB holds gpt-oss 20B.
Which is faster for local AI, the Mac mini M4 16GB or the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB?
On the models both run fully in memory, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is about 1.8× as fast as the Mac mini M4 16GB (estimated, median across models).
What is the price difference between the Mac mini M4 16GB and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB?
In Germany the Mac mini M4 16GB costs 800 € at eBay and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB 550 € at Amazon: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is 250 € cheaper.

More comparisons