Intel Arc A770 16GB vs Mac mini M4 16GB

For running models locally, priced in Germany. At 8k context the first runs 14 models fully in memory, the second 13.

In short

Both have 16 GB of memory for models; the Intel Arc A770 16GB has 560 GB/s of bandwidth and the Mac mini M4 16GB 120 GB/s. At 8k context the Intel Arc A770 16GB runs 14 of the models we track fully in memory and the Mac mini M4 16GB 13; only the Intel Arc A770 16GB holds gpt-oss 20B. On the models both run fully in memory, the Intel Arc A770 16GB is about 3.6× as fast as the Mac mini M4 16GB (estimated, median across models). In Germany the Intel Arc A770 16GB costs 646 € at eBay and the Mac mini M4 16GB 800 € at eBay: the Intel Arc A770 16GB is 154 € cheaper.

Updated . Speeds are estimates; how they are worked out.

Specifications

SpecIntel Arc A770 16GBMac mini M4 16GB
GPUArc A770 16GB–
Memory16 GB GDDR6–
Memory bus256-bit128-bit
Memory bandwidth560 GB/s120 GB/s
FP16 compute131 TFLOPS3.76 TFLOPS
SoftwareSYCL / oneAPIMetal
Board power225 W–
PCIe generationGen 4–
PCIe lanesx16–
Chip–Apple M4 (10-core GPU)
Unified memory–16 GB
GPU can use by default–10.7 GB
GPU can use, tuned–10.666666666666666 GB
Operating system–macos
Processor–M4 10-core
Storage–256 GB

What each runs

Estimated decode speed with the most precise quant that fits each one est.

ModelIntel Arc A770 16GBMac mini M4 16GB
gpt-oss 20B59tok/sMXFP4won't run
Gemma 4 12B21tok/sQ8_08tok/sQ6_K
Qwen 3.5 9B28tok/sQ8_08tok/sQ8_0
Ministral 3 14B23tok/sQ6_K8tok/sQ4_K_M
Qwen3 14B21tok/sQ6_K8tok/sQ4_K_M
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B28tok/sQ8_08tok/sQ8_0
Qwen3 8B28tok/sQ8_08tok/sQ8_0
Phi-4 14B20tok/sQ6_K7tok/sQ4_K_M
Qwen 3.5 4B58tok/sQ8_016tok/sQ8_0
Ministral 3 8B28tok/sQ8_08tok/sQ8_0
Granite 4.2 8B26tok/sQ8_07tok/sQ8_0
Gemma 4 E4B33tok/sQ8_09tok/sQ8_0
LFM2.5 8B-A1B105tok/sQ8_032tok/sQ8_0
Llama 3.1 8B37tok/sQ6_K10tok/sQ6_K
Qwen 3.8 27Boffloadwon't run
Qwen 3.5 122B-A10Boffloadwon't run
Qwen 3.6 27Boffloadwon't run
Gemma 4 31Boffloadwon't run
Mistral Small 4 119Boffloadwon't run
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3Boffloadwon't run
Qwen 3.5 27Boffloadwon't run
Gemma 4 26B-A4Boffloadwon't run
Qwen 3.5 35B-A3Boffloadwon't run
GLM 4.7 Flashoffloadwon't run
Devstral Small 2 24Boffloadwon't run
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3Boffloadwon't run
Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3Boffloadwon't run
Kimi Linear 48B-A3Boffloadwon't run
Qwen3 32Boffloadwon't run
Mistral Small 3.2 24Boffloadwon't run
Gemma 3 27Boffloadwon't run
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32Boffloadwon't run
DeepSeek V4 Flashwon't runwon't run
GLM 5.3 Flashwon't runwon't run
Qwen 3.8 Flash Nextwon't runwon't run
MiniMax M2.7won't runwon't run
Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12Bwon't runwon't run
Qwen3 Coder Nextwon't runwon't run
gpt-oss 120Bwon't runwon't run
GLM 4.5 Airwon't runwon't run
Qwen3 Next 80B-A3Bwon't runwon't run
Llama 3.3 70Bwon't runwon't run

Questions

Which is better for local AI, the Intel Arc A770 16GB or the Mac mini M4 16GB?
Choose the Intel Arc A770 16GB to run bigger models. Choose the Intel Arc A770 16GB for speed. Choose the Intel Arc A770 16GB to spend less.
Which can run bigger models, the Intel Arc A770 16GB or the Mac mini M4 16GB?
At 8k context the Intel Arc A770 16GB runs 14 of the models we track fully in memory and the Mac mini M4 16GB 13; only the Intel Arc A770 16GB holds gpt-oss 20B.
Which is faster for local AI, the Intel Arc A770 16GB or the Mac mini M4 16GB?
On the models both run fully in memory, the Intel Arc A770 16GB is about 3.6× as fast as the Mac mini M4 16GB (estimated, median across models).
What is the price difference between the Intel Arc A770 16GB and the Mac mini M4 16GB?
In Germany the Intel Arc A770 16GB costs 646 € at eBay and the Mac mini M4 16GB 800 € at eBay: the Intel Arc A770 16GB is 154 € cheaper.

More comparisons